International air cargo insurance is an important tool for mitigating transportation risks. However, in practice, claims disputes often arise due to misunderstandings of terms and conditions, oversights in procedures, and other factors.
In this article, Weefreight will analyze the causes of disputes and address these issues, drawing on common scenarios. We hope this will be helpful.
- Cargo Damage/Loss: Unclear Definition of Liability
Common Dispute Points:
Insurance Company Denials: Claims that cargo damage stems from “inherent defects” (e.g., natural spoilage of fresh produce), “improper packaging” (e.g., lack of cushioning for fragile items), or falls within the scope of the carrier’s liability exemptions (e.g., loss due to force majeure).
Consignors face difficulties in proving the loss occurred within the policy period due to inability to provide key evidence such as photos of the damaged goods or the carrier’s receipt.
Strategies:
When purchasing insurance, specify “all risks” (covering most risks except those specifically excluded) and avoid selecting “peace insurance” (covering only major accidents).
Before shipping, take videos/photos of the goods in good condition. Request the carrier to indicate the packaging condition (e.g., “Packaged intact” or “Fragile”) on the waybill. Inspect the goods on-site upon receipt, and immediately have the carrier sign a damage certificate if any issues are found.
II. Claim Amount Disputes: Inconsistent Damage Assessment Standards
Common Points of Dispute:
Discrepancy between insurance amount and actual value: To save premiums, cargo owners purchase insurance for an amount lower than the actual value of the goods (e.g., only 50,000 yuan for a 100,000 yuan value). After a claim occurs, the insurance company pays compensation based on the insured percentage, leaving the cargo owner dissatisfied.
Discrepancy in damage assessment basis: The insurance company assesses damage based on the “replacement cost” (the price of repurchasing the same goods), while the cargo owner demands compensation based on the “transaction contract price” (including profit), resulting in a disagreement.
Strategy:
Insure the goods for the full “actual value” to avoid underinsurance resulting in a proportional compensation payment. If the cargo is high-value (such as electronics or luxury goods), a “value-added clause” can be added, stipulating that damages be assessed based on the contract price or invoice amount.
When purchasing insurance, retain the purchase contract, invoice, and other proof of value to clearly define the damage assessment criteria and avoid vague terms.
III. Delay Loss: Limited Insurance Coverage
Common Disputes:
Air cargo suffers flight delays, resulting in missed sales seasons (e.g., holiday gifts) or spoiled fresh produce. The cargo owner claims for “loss of expected profit,” but the insurance company denies the claim on the grounds that “delay insurance is not separately insured” or that “the loss is indirect.”
Strategies:
If the cargo is time-sensitive (e.g., fresh produce or exhibition samples), separate “delay insurance” should be purchased, clearly stipulating that “claims are payable if delay exceeds XX hours” and specifying the scope of compensation (e.g., direct losses, reasonable expected profits).
Avoid including “indirect losses” (e.g., contractual penalties due to delays) in the claim scope; such losses are generally not covered by insurance.
- Incomplete Documents: Missing Claim Materials
Common Points of Dispute:
When a cargo owner is unable to provide complete documentation (such as the waybill, insurance policy, proof of cargo value, and loss list), the insurance company may delay or deny the claim due to incomplete documentation.
Strategies:
Prepare a list of required claim materials (which can be obtained from the insurance company), including:
The original insurance policy and application form;
The airway bill (which must specify cargo and carrier information);
Proof of cargo loss (such as a damage note signed by the carrier or a police certificate of loss);
Proof of cargo value (invoice, contract, packing list);
Claim Form (specifying the details of the loss and the amount).
- Exclusions: Misunderstanding of Clauses
Common Points of Dispute:
The insurance company denies claims based on an “exclusion clause,” such as for reasons of war, nuclear contamination, or intentional acts by the cargo owner, but the cargo owner believes the clause is a “standard clause” and was not clearly stated.
Strategies:
When applying for insurance, ask the insurance company to clearly explain exclusions (e.g., situations where compensation is not provided) and request written clarification for ambiguous clauses (e.g., the specific scope of “force majeure”).
When signing the insurance contract, carefully review the bolded exemption clauses to confirm your understanding and acceptance, to avoid any subsequent claims of invalidity based on “lack of notice” (in legal practice, standard clauses must fulfill their obligation to provide notice to be valid).
Summary: Core Principles for Avoiding Claims Disputes
Clarify Needs and Target Insurance: Select insurance based on the characteristics of the goods (value, fragility, and timeliness), and add necessary clauses.
Preserve Evidence and Have a Back-up: Record the condition of the goods from shipment to receipt, and properly store documents.
Clarify Responsibilities and Agree in Advance: Clarify with the insurance company the damage assessment criteria and scope of liability. Avoid verbal promises; rely on the written contract.
If you have any international logistics service needs, please click the floating chat icon in the lower right corner or other contact information in the lower right corner of the page to communicate with us immediately!
